Taming Of The Shrew Essays - The Taming Of The Shrew, Free Essays

Subduing Of The Shrew Essays - The Taming Of The Shrew, Free Essays Subduing Of The Shrew In William Shakespeares Taming of the Shrew, Katherine isn't really restrained on the grounds that she just follows Petruchios orders without changing her soul. Petruchio gets his hands full when he weds Katherine. She is an exceptionally wild and unpleasant lady who should be restrained. In the start of the story, Katherine is an extremely wild lady; her dad talks about her brutal ways: For disgrace, thou hilding of a malicious soul! (II, I., 27-28). Baptista, Katherines father, is clearly tired of Katherine and her savage habits for him to absolute such solid words to his little girl. Katherine is wild to such an extent that she will always be unable to be restrained. All through the play, she remains thusly. While in transit to Biancas wedding, Petruchio takes steps to turn around except if Katherine concurs that the moon is sparkling, and it isn't the sun, as it honestly seems to be. Hortensio, one of Petruchios companions, encourages Katherine to agree to Petruchio: Hortensio: Say as he says, or we will never go. Katherine: Forward, I supplicate, since we have come so charge, And be it moon, or sun, or on the other hand what you please. (IV, v., 13-15) Katherine is getting brilliant at obeying Petruchio. She currently sees how to get what she needs from him. Her soul is still wild and untamed; in any case, she acts faithful to Petruchio on a superficial level to abstain from enduring Petruchios disciplines. By not changing her tendency, Katherine shows Petruchio that he isn't in control. The men of the town of Padua need to discover a man to wed Katherine to free her reasonable sister, Bianca. Katherines father won't permit Bianca to wed until the senior is hitched. Petruchio is convinced to wed Katherine, for the most part for her dads settlement. When Petruchio initially meets Katherine and discusses marriage, she is wild and she attempts to flee from him: I scrape you in the event that I falter. Release me. (II. I., 255). Katherine wouldn't like to be with Petruchio. She is cheerful being without anyone else and making her sister hopeless. She is a free lady, and she appreciates satisfying her notoriety. When Petruchio neglects to tune in to Katherine about what kind of outfit she needs to wear to Biancas wedding, she is rankled: Why, sir, I believe I may have leave to speak, And speak I will. I am no youngster, no angel. Your betters have suffered me state my psyche, And in the even t that you can't, best you stop your ears. My tongue will tell the resentment of my heart, Or else my heart, disguising it, will break, And, as opposed to it will, I will be free Even to the furthest, however i see fit, words. (IV, iii., 78-85). Katherine straightforwardly conflicts with her better half. She doesn't show him the regard a spouse ought to get. Katherine never changes her untamed ways; she remains wild on the most fundamental level. Clearly, in William Shakespeares Taming of the Shrew, Katherine is never really subdued by Petruchio. Reference index The Taming of the Shrew, by William Shakespeare

Essay --

Kelly Larson The Glass Castle Book Review The Glass Castle, composed by Jeannette Walls, is a fiction, diary, for the most part suggested for youthful grown-ups. It’s dependent on a genuine story, from the perspective of a little youngster about the battles of her youth. Much the same as the book Half Broke Horse, it depicts the hardships they looked as youngsters, and how they beat the chances of following in their parents’ strides realizing that since they had a terrible youth, didn’t mean they would have an awful life. The book begins showing that the guardians show little enthusiasm for their kid’s wellbeing and introduction to the world. They moved from town to town for whatever length of time that their Dad could hold an occupation. They lived anyplace from the pastry grounds, to forsake houses, and when they were extremely urgent, the Grandparents house. Their father was a splendid man who showed them everything from material science, math, and stargazing, to catching their creative mind and instructing them to live unafraid. In any case, from his own youth encounters, he had gotten a heavy drinker and was scarcely ever home. At the point when they proceeded onward ...

Try and Try Again Essays - Presentation Experience, Poor Grades

The witticism, if from the start you dont succeed, attempt, attempt once more, is an expression that I concur with. In my life, I have put forth an attempt to continue on utilizing a few unique ways to deal with an issue or objective so as to be effective. One model that I rings a bell is my college introduction. Indeed, even as a green beans, I wanted to get guidance from the educator about how to make introduction. Honestly, I was totally confounded in the main discussion. By and by, I have figured out how to look into, about non-verbal communication and have propelled a few crusades to make a decent introduction. My first genuine introduction experience was at the college. For about a month and a half, I looked into in excess of 200 pages per day, observing significant data cautiously. I figured out how to sort out material into areas like. Toward the finish of about a month and a half, I made an introduction in the class. Yet, I didn't recollect that anything and I felt exceptionally debilitated. So I started to peruse my notes. My educator shut down my discourse since I talked excessively long and everyone lost their consideration. Thus, I got horrible scores at the midterm and I needed to buckle down for the last test of the year. Despite the fact that I had bombed as far as I can tell, I despite everything got an opportunity to pass the course. This time I followed a thorough working arrangement. I focused on non-verbal communication just as structure. I took a mirror to my room with the goal that it is simpler to make practice. I joined a social club and watched individuals as they were giving introductions. In spite of the fact that I made a decent introduction as I need, and I started to get supplements from companions on my introduction. By the by, I ended up heading off to a disco with companions from my club, missing exercise since I was excessively occupied. Getting ready for the last was impractical on the grounds that I was showing up later than expected. I bombed the last once more. On the off chance that I needed to , I could have avoided the course, however I attempted once more. I met one individual who is was fruitful at giving the introduction. She gave me private exercises. I took in another technique for a fruitful introduction, for example, talking unmistakably. My introduction turned out to be increasingly justifiable and was clock shorter. Besides, by contemplating the exercise without anyone else and effectively tuning in to different understudies, I have gradually arrived at my objective. At the point when I was making the introduction, I felt certainty and defeated the test. Along these lines, as you see, I attempted and attempted once more, however finally I prevailing with regards to finding a way that worked for me. What's more, I realized inquiring about, non-verbal communication and talking plainly. What is significant isn't to surrender and to gain from every disappointment.

Gender Roles and Marriage in Eliot and Trollope - Literature Essay Samples

In law a husband and wife are one person, and the husband is that personA womanhas got to put up with the life her husband makes for herIn Middlemarch, George Eliot offers a portrayal of a closely-knit, semi-rural community, but in fact transcends this simplistic framework to consider a number of social and political questions, thereby positioning herself as one of the great dialectical writers of the Victorian era. Eliots interest fails to be ignited by the gossip and petty politics of rural life, and her amused contempt, which vacillates from the cynical to the scathing when she describes the locals of Middlemarch, points to the fact that she requires protagonists who are intellectuals to prevent her works from sliding into the depths of irony and condescension. Since Eliot seems not to be writing about the society of Middlemarch itself, the novel coheres on the theme of marriage; it is here that the disparate points of the plot converge, and here where Eliots real strengths lie. Similarly, in He Knew He Was Right, Anthony Trollope focuses not on the political workings of a particular town (in this case, Barchester) or institution (such as the Church of England), but instead on the choices made in marriage. In particular, Eliot and Trollope contemplate estrangement and the consequences of wrongful decisions, drawing on a series of explorations of male authority to bring their works into the larger Victorian debate over womens rights. During the late 17th and 18th centuries, society witnessed the onset of a shift away from the notion that married love could only exist as an ideal, and towards an ethical imperative to marry for love. Although by no means constituting a radical maneuver away from the status quo espoused by Blackstone, the murmurings of John Lockes contractual ethic began to insinuate themselves into the institution of government, as well as the family. Locke defined contract as a mutually voluntary agreement, contending that any violation of the terms of the contract would render it dissoluble. However, as soon as this contractual ethic was applied to marriage, it opened up a conversation about the contractual foundations of marriage, which ensure that the husband should not subordinate or undermine his wife. Adding to this was an argument about the economic consequences of marriage: womens rights were a necessary corollary of the progress enjoyed during the Victorian period. These factors all converged on the campaigns leading to reforms, including the Factory Acts of 1844, 1847, and 1850 (affecting women and children), the Matrimonial Causes Act of 1857 (giving a legally separated wife the right to keep her own earnings, and allowing, in the case of a man divorcing his wife for adultery, the wife to argue that her adultery was aggravated by cruelty or desertion), and finally, in 1870, the first Womens Property Act. Set in the 1830s against the background of the frenzied appeals and counter-attacks centred on th e legal denial of female subjectivity, Middlemarch is a novel focused on the debate over womens property and the right to marry for love. Eliot incorporates examples both of characters that fail to conform to societal expectations (whom she clearly feels are admirable), as well as characters so consumed with traditional ideas of male authority and female subservience that Eliot feels they ought to be taught a lesson. She therefore successfully narrates and criticises simultaneously. That Dorothea is described as having a nature altogether ardent, theoretic, and intellectually consequentstruggling in the bands of a narrow teaching, hemmed in by a social life which seemed nothing but a labyrinth of petty courses, a walled-in mazy of small paths that led no wither seems to suggest that Eliot intends to highlight the damaging effects the provincial society of Middlemarch can have on even a strong-willed teenager. For further emphasis, Eliot writes in her prelude: Women were expected to have weak opinions; but the great safeguard of society and of domestic life was, that opinions were not acted on. The power of custom is also expressed through several of the major male figures in the novel, not least from the rather unenlightened Arthur Brooke. Mr Brookes dialogue is largely comprised of traditional attitudes concerning the nature of women, who he thinks are suitable only for music, the fine arts, that kind of thing. His dismissal of Dorotheas knowledge and aspirations directly impacts the topic at hand marriage since the cultural assumptions concerning female inferiority and male intelligence propel bright female characters like his niece into a difficult position in the domestic sphere. Dorothea is clearly not a perfect character Eliot makes no attempt to hide her distaste for Dorotheas self-damaging characteristics and in chapter 4, Celia chides her sister, saying, You always see what nobody else seesyet you never seen what is quite plain. However, while the character of Dorothea speaks in intense, beautiful metaphors and is presented as a selfless innocent, Eliots depiction of Mr Casaubon borders at times on caricature. Eliot seems to work through superlative juxtapositions in order to emphasise the importance of making right choices in marriage, and although she does portray Casaubon attempting to show kindness to Dorothea, she takes every opportunity to describe him as repulsive and deaths head and, at one point, as Miltons affable archangel.Trollope employs a similar tone of socio-historical observation of the individual experiences that, born out of societys unenlightened attitudes, evidently shape the marriages of his characters. Hugh Stanbury is one case in point: he becomes a hero because he marries despite his lack of money. There came upon him some dim ideal of self-abnegation, thatthe poetry of his life was, in fact, the capacity of caring more for other human beings than for himself. Similarly, Nora Rowley rej ects Lord Peterboroughs proposal of marriage, and says, there is a time when a girl must be supposed to know what is best for herself, just as there is for a man when she is reprimanded by her parents for having chosen Hugh. Trollopes character is thus engaging in fairly radical feminist talk. Trollope re-emphasises the contractual ethic of married love in his articulation of Trevelyans obsession with his perceived right to mastery and the monomania that ensues. He cannot trust Emily, and therefore believes she requires the rigours of surveillance. However, by hiring a personal detective, Trevelyan undermines the entire basis of the consensual contract that feminists hoped to see introduced to the institution of marriage. Eventually, Trevelyan destroys his own home, symbolically destroying the domesticity that he had always longed for. Trollope therefore appears to equate female subjectivity with domesticity, demonstrating that a marriage must be based on mutual love and respect in order to function.It is significant that Eliots most remarkable passages are centered on the troubles of marriage. For example, after Dorotheas wedding, she reflects:But the door-sill of marriage once crossed, expectation is concentrated on the present. Having once embarked on your marital voyage, it is impossible not to be aware that you make no way and that the sea is not within sight that, in fact, you are exploring an enclosed basin.This metaphor of the voyage of marriage aptly describes the burgeoning loss and hopelessness that Dorothea feels as her marriage fails to live up to her expectations. Later in the novel, Lydgate describes his disappointment in his marriage by saying that he feels as if he had opened a door out of a suffocating place and had found it walled up. Here, Eliot uses the language of imprisonment to describe the emotions of a male victim of the contemporary culture. Indeed, the novels strength is its presentation of the tragedy of a failed marriage. In a truly consensual contract, both partners would be able to continue to fulfil their ambitions, each enjoying the others encouragement. However, the murder of both Dorothea and Lydgates raison-dÃÆ'Â ªtres social reform and scientific progress, respectively emphasises once again the importance of the contractual ethic and the damaging effects of the legal denial of female subjectivity. A remarkable incident in He Knew He Was Right occurs when Miss Stanbury is told of Dorothys rejection of Mr Gibson, at which point she declares that it was as though I were asking her to walk the streets. Ironically, prostituting herself is exactly what Miss Stanbury is asking Dorothy to do in saying she should marry a man for purely mercenary reasons.The main question in the readers mind throughout Middlemarch besides whether Dorothea will indeed eventually marry Will Ladislaw is the question of why she married Casaubon in the first place. Despite her self-deprecating statements and desi re for knowledge, it seems inconceivable that someone as feisty and romantic as Dorothea could ever fall for some as cold and unfeeling as Casaubon. And yet Dorothea fails to ask herself this question. While Celia is happy in a more superficial, traditional partnership, Dorothea is unable to reconcile her desire for independence with this conventional practice, and so requires a more modern marriage of consensual love and respect. However, one could posit that Dorothea is unable to love at the time of her introduction to Casaubon as a result of the damage she sustained having been orphaned and brought up by her uncle. In addition, it is clear that Dorothea is a fantasist, and to some degree she is indeed marrying a father-figure. She attempts to treat the relationship as a fantasy, musing over absence and loss, treating Casaubon as both a lover and a father. This approach, however, ultimately fails, inspiring her to turn to Will as a release from the monotony. It is important to acknowledge that neither George Eliot nor Anthony Trollope can really be labeled proto-feminists. The Lockean appeal on the principle of contract permeated the 19th century, and although Eliot was enlightened (she clearly would have had more of a vested interest in womens rights than Trollope, being a woman herself), Trollope appears fundamentally ambivalent about feminism; both have clearly been conditioned by the society in which they exist. In He Knew He Was Right, Trollope seems to suggest that male authority is right, but ought to manifest itself through loving persuasion rather than harsh coercion. It is certainly not a radically feminist polemic, and both Trollope and Eliot are clearly interested in other social questions as well as those pertaining to womens rights. Trollope does point to Locke and idealize marriages borne of love, but he also highlights the general issue of progress both economic and domestic beyond the arena of womens rights. It is significant al so that Eliot focuses on the relationship between pity and marriage Bulstrode is pitied by his faithful wife, and yet Rosamund has no sympathy for her husbands aspirations. The place of women, Eliot certainly seems to maintain, is to support their husbands, as Mary expresses in a surprising moment of sardonic observation: husbands are an inferior class of men, who require keeping in order. Indeed, when men and women make comparable mistakes in Middlemarch, the men are found culpable, while the women are not. Both Lydgate and Dorothea make bad marriage choices, and although our sympathy may lie with both, Lydgate is presented as a fool, while Dorothea an innocent victim. To some extent, there is no escape for the characters of Middlemarch and He Knew He Was Right they exist solely within the framework of Victorian society. Both heroines are admirably strong-willed, but Dorothea and Emily lived before 1870, and the authors are realistic in their presentations of their situation s. They do not seem to be forcefully pushing for change, and Eliot in fact altered her remarkably feminist ending to a more conventional one prior to publication. The era was steeped in debate about womens rights with regards to marriage and property, and it would be surprising if the debate failed to seep into social novels such as these. Of course, the authors choose to make more of the topic than this, focusing on estrangement in marriage as an example of the outcome of contemporary conventions, but what they created are by no means a one-sided radical polemics. Indeed, both authors are admirably objective in their narrative and characterisation, pointing out the good and bad points of all the characters. Thus they create novels that focus on particular people living during the Victorian era, under Victorian conventions, and participating in a Victorian dialogue. Eliot and Trollope are interested in the legal denial of the rights of women because the characters are subject to this, but it is a subtle and character-based exploration, not an aggressive radical polemic.

Rhetorical Analysis Of President Kennedy s Inaugural Speech

What rhetorical features does President Kennedy use to achieve his desired purpose? Introduction Politicians often use language to both persuade and imperceptibly control the opinions/decisions of their audience: whether it is to gain their support, to present their point, or implant their principles. It is of utmost importance to them to do this subtly, in order to not come across as too aggressive, intimidating or manipulative. As a result, the politician has to use language that is relatable, informative and understandable but also persuasive and strong. In my study into the way rhetoric is used by politicians, specifically, J.F Kennedy, my attention will be focused on how language is used to control, persuade and influence. Aims I will focus on the general aim of: †¢ Exploring and determining what rhetorical features J.F Kennedy displays in his inaugural speech to convey his message. My primary is to analyse and conclude: †¢ The types of rhetoric J.F Kennedy uses and the main reason behind their use However, I will also look into the following areas: †¢ How the use of certain rhetorical devices changes the tone of the speech. †¢ How often Kennedy uses persuasive techniques during his inaugural speech. †¢ Which persuasive techniques are most often utilised and applied. Methodology In order to explore the use of political rhetoric I have taken the whole of J.F.K’s inaugural speech to understand why he uses the techniques he does. As a result I plan to look at the use ofShow MoreRelatedRhetorical Analysis Of John F. Kennedy s Inaugural Address Essay1566 Words   |  7 PagesBUT FREEDOM: Rhetorical Analysis of John F. Kennedy’s Inaugural Address Tanner A. Woody Anderson University On January 20, 1961, John Fitzgerald Kennedy delivered a speech with a backdrop of snow and a twenty-degree wind blowing in his face in Washington D.C. In his speech, he starts off with saying that his victory is not for a party but it is for freedom. At the climax of his speech, JFK delivers a call to action which is also the most well-known line from his speech: â€Å"†¦ask not whatRead MoreThe Inaugural Address Of John F. Kennedy1441 Words   |  6 PagesThe Pathway to Success â€Å"The Inaugural Address of John F. Kennedy is considered one of the greatest speeches in twentieth-century American public address,† says Sara Ann Mehltretter from Penn State University. The 1960s was an important time period during American history. The speech was said to motivate Americans and unite them to successfully create a powerful government. In a time of desperation, the actions that the United States government would take to help come out successful was very importantRead MoreAnalysis of John F Kennedys Presidency870 Words   |  3 PagesIntroduction John F. Kennedy, the 35th president of the United States, has become one of the most famous presidents in the nations history due to his oratory skills and eloquence (Biane,2011). In this paper, we present an analysis the inaugural speech that he delivered in January 1961. Even though his Inaugural speech lasted less than fifteen minutes, the message that he saliently delivered was one that has continued to resonate in the very hearts of American citizens. The analysis An analysis of John FRead MoreThe Inaugural Address Of John F. Kennedy1654 Words   |  7 PagesAn Effort Closer to A Better Country â€Å"The Inaugural Address of John F. Kennedy is considered one of the greatest speeches in twentieth-century American public address,† says Sara Ann Mehltretter from Penn State University. The 1960s was an important time period during American history. The speech was said to motivate Americans and unite them to successfully create a powerful government. In a time of desperation, the actions that the United States government would take to help come out successfulRead MoreInspirational Tools Of An Inspiration Leader1531 Words   |  7 Pages1961, President John F. Kennedy was sworn into office and delivered one of the most famous and remembered inaugural addresses in U.S. history. Kennedy was motivated to calm fears about the rise of Soviet power during the 1950`s. With his elaborated speech he called upon American citizens to act in support of their government. The motivation for American citizens to defend freedom and democracy introduced a challenge and an opportunity for Kennedy with his tactics for presidency. In his Inaugural AddressRead MoreSignificant Improvement : Things That I Have Learned From English 10101105 Words   |  5 Pagesstarted to now? Or have I remained the same or worse have I become a worse writer and reader? These are questions that need to be answered by a self-reflection and evaluation. One must always set goals and analyze their growth or the lack thereof. The analysis of progress helps show how far one has come, and it also helps the rate of improvement accelerate. Throughout this semester, I have improved my writing, reading, and critical thinking skills. I have accomplished this by effectively taking advantageRead MoreThe Presidential Election Will Elect The President And Vice President Of The United States2648 Words   |  11 PagesLiterature Review: On November 8, 2016, the United States’ 58th presidential elections will take place, where voters will elect the President and the Vice President of the United States. One of the customs of Presidential elections is the debates held between the candidates prior to that event. The topics discussed in these debates are of controversial nature and their role is to target and convince undecided and independent voters - those not belonging to a specific political party. Presidential

Gattaca Essay free essay sample

Gattaca Essay Gattaca is a futuristic movie that addresses the possible issues of genetic discrimination and the problems that occur in a scientifically enhanced world. The movie gives many example of genetic discrimination as it follows the life of the main character Vincent, a genetically disabled person or invalid. As apposed to a genetically perfect, valid. The more prominent issues brought up involving invalids include finding suitable early child care and obtaining jobs in preferred industries. Both these matters have convincing positive and negative arguments that will be summarised below. Genetic discrimination takes place in many different areas throughout the movie but begins at the child care centre Vincent’s mother and father try to enrol him in. They are unable to sign him up as he was diagnosed at birth with numerous possible genetic disorders that the child care centres insurance would not cover for. This leads to other problems such as the parents having to educate him at home from an early age which could possibly develop other concerns. We will write a custom essay sample on Gattaca Essay or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page His social skills would be severely undeveloped due to lack of socialisation with other children his age. With his parents teaching him Vincent may not have been able to gain the highest possible level of education that the child care centre would have otherwise been able to provide. He would then begin his higher education lacking in the skills other valid students in his year already possessed. On the other hand without invalid students attending child care centres the educators are able to give more attention to the valid students that are more likely to succeed and progress towards a productive future in the work force. If an invalid student is permitted to attend a child care centre the safety of that child and the others attending is severely compromised. If a supervisor was constantly worried about the safety of the invalid child their attention would not be evenly distributed between the other students which could cause other dangerous situations. All throughout his life Vincent dreamed of going into space but because he was an invalid it was an almost unattainable dream. The only way he was able to obtain his goal was to take the identity of a valid. By doing this and accumulating enough knowledge to pass as a valid he became an astronaut and with some difficulties made it into space. If he had not been able to take a valid’s identity Vincent would have suffered as he would not have achieved his full potential in contributing to society. The most significant problem with being an invalid in the work force is that the higher paid jobs are unavailable because of their status so they have to make do with a lower paid job where they may be exploited and forced to work with minimal pay due to their increasing need for money. There are however many advantages for the employers. They are more likely to know who to hire and how productive that employee will be. This reduces the likelihood of fired employees and employing more people for a job that could be accomplished by only one valid. As well as this if an applying employee wants the position enough they will keep striving to be better than the rest and this will in turn force the standard higher in the work force which can only be seen as a benefit. In conclusion there are many arguments for and against genetic discrimination. Discrimination aids almost everyone who isn’t being discriminated against. For example the child care workers are able to reduce their numbers to concentrate on individual needs and reduce their insurance costs, where as employees are able to reduce the number of employees which therefore reduces their expenses. Unfortunately the invalids being discriminated against do not get an adequate early education and often miss out on well paid jobs in the industries they take an interest in. In some cases discrimination does work because the majority of people are valid’s and they are getting the benefits while the invalids strive to achieve their maximum potentials in a world of genetic perfection. Word Count: 688 words

Tips For Better Network Essay Topics

Tips For Better Network Essay TopicsIf you want to get published in a better and higher quality of paper, then focus on the network essay topics programming paradigms. In an essay, it is the network that stands out the most and what is best about it is that you need to use them in your research to find out new things. Let us see how it is possible for you to get involved in a more meaningful way with the topics and to excel on that paper. This might prove to be something that will greatly help you in the long run.The first thing that you should do is to get to know how the network is used in the subjects. There are people who regard their essays as experimental or conceptual. In other words, they are not working under an integrated approach. They try to lay things out as they are not giving much attention to the structure. If this is the case, then you have to make sure that you can go ahead with an integrated approach and that you have understood the basic principles of network.The next thing that you need to understand is that network is a system and that the network is one of the most important things that you should look at in your subject. Network is basically a process of creating relationships, forming a network. It is a network of connections that can be formed and there are two kinds of networks - one that can have a problem and the other that can avoid it. Network also has many functions. These include but are not limited to the following:- Connecting people, people who share similar interests, people who share the same discipline, groups and organizations that work together; this is a way to make people communicate with each other. In other words, you need to keep a network alive. Make sure that people are going to give you good ideas so that you can do research and also to help you solve problems.- Network also can bring about a steady flow of information. You need to do your work well so that you can make some analysis about the topics and also hav e great ways to solve problems and better positions to work on your essays.- As discussed earlier, the network can enable people to meet and interact. If you are going to use the network, you need to make sure that you are going to be bringing these people to you so that you can listen to their ideas. Network also brings about open lines of communication.- The above are just some of the basic rules that you need to remember about the network. Once you have understood how the network works, then it is the next step that you need to go and make use of it. The most important thing that you need to understand about the network is that it is an excellent resource for your research and you can use it to gain information about the subjects that you are working on. Also, when you think about network essay topics, you can see that network essay topics include programming paradigms, network, and network support.The network essay topics are a great help when you are writing your essay. The fac t that you can go ahead with an integrated approach gives you the best opportunity to show all the facets of the subject. All you need to do is to make sure that you use the network properly so that you can get the best results from it. You can use the network to your advantage by making your essay more effective and also by giving the right information to your reader.